<p>Should the reading of &ldquo;shalt be&rdquo; be in the bible at Revelation 16:5? Did Theodore Beza simply make this reading up as James White claims? Is this reading a textual emendation, or is there evidence for the reading? Did the KJV translators and the Elzevirs slavishly follow what Beza liked here, rejecting the true reading?&nbsp;This book examines the claims that the Revelation 16:5 reading is an error in the King James Version and should be changed to read &ldquo;holy.&rdquo; The author is persuaded that after you have read this book, you will not only be convinced of the reading of &ldquo;shalt be&rdquo; (Greek esomenos), but you will see that all of the internal and external evidence point to this reading.<br />
&nbsp;</p>