<p><strong>Not quite non-fiction, not quite self-help. It's a work of art about conflicting philosophies.</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>Many books believe they know how you should live.</strong> But each book disagrees with the next. In "How to Live", each chapter believes it knows how you should live. And <strong>each chapter disagrees with the next</strong>.</p><p><br></p><p>One chapter makes a compelling argument for why you should be completely independent, keeping all options open. The next chapter argues why you should commit to one career, one place, and one person.</p><p><br></p><p>One chapter persuades you to be fully present, and experience each moment. The next, to delay gratification and invest for the future.</p><p><br></p><p>Which one is right? Which does the author believe? All of them. It's <strong>a philosophy of conflicting philosophies</strong>.</p><p><br></p><p>A very unique and thought-provoking book. Meant for reflection as much as instruction.</p><p><br></p><p>113 incredibly succinct pages of profound insights. No philosophers are quoted. No -isms are named. Only <strong>actionable directives</strong>. The end result feels more like poetry than prose.</p>
